Abortion and Universal Health-care

November 13, 2009 - Much has been said about the proposed universal health-care bill. Politicians from the left and right side of the aisle have expressed their constituents concerns towards views on various issues that would impact them once the bill passes. Perhaps the most troublesome part of the bill for legislators and administrative officials is determining how to reconcile differences in opinion and opposing social views on abortion funding, spending and the government’s role to satisfy the forthright majority, which adamantly opposes tax dollars being used for abortion services.
What would you think though if you heard that excluding abortion services or providing language to exclude abortion services is being considered unconstitutional and a violation of First Amendment freedoms? This is the claim that was presented in a recent article on the Examiner website written by Marc Rubin. Whether or not he is correct in his analysis of the abortion vs. universal health-care issues, he does make several valid points in his First Amendment argument for the case, something that people from all faiths and backgrounds should be discussing openly with one another. Mr. Rubin argues that,
1. “Thomas Jefferson specifically wrote in his letters that the First Amendment regarding religion was designed, in Jefferson's words, "to build a wall between the government and the church". The Founders wanted to make sure the church would never have any official influence or hand in the affairs of state.”
2. “The wall established by the Constitution was taken down by Nancy Pelosi and Barrack Obama when they caved in to political pressure by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops who are credited with creating the anti- abortion language in the health care bill.”
3. “The bishops were acting no doubt out of a sense of morality based on their religious beliefs, but beliefs not shared or even accepted by tens of millions of people.”
4. “They [founding fathers] did not want legislation affecting tens of millions, or now hundreds of millions, written by politicians, that were influenced by the religious beliefs of any one particular religious entity.”
Sources:
Examiner
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (Letter to Congress)





3 Comments:
I don't think abortion is just a religious issue. While it is rallied by the political Right and Left it remains also a concern of anyone who thinks that ethically killing another human being in utero is murder. There are many people outside the Religious circle who are concerned about the morality and ethics of diminishing the value of a human being based on size, capacity to function, development and ability to survive outside the womb as a leverage to use for if another human being's rights to life are terminated. If the same was said for those who were in such states based on disease or trauma it would be seen as murder. Many of us who are pro-life but non-religious see all life as sacred and that the issue really boils down to a vast majority of humans beings in utero killed as a means of birth control instead of for valid and rare reasons. This is inexcusable. While it can be simplified to a separation of Church and State issue it really does a disservices to the real complexities of the problem.
I am in agreement with Christie on many points, abortion is murder no matter how you try to justify it. There are too many versions of birth control to get pregnant if it's not wanted. Expecting the general population to support and pay for your mistakes was never intended by our founding fathers, they were hard working independent people who took care of their issues without looking for a handout....Seperation of church and state yes, social programs that support carelessness NO.
At least this time, we didn't completely disregard rape victims, victims of faulty birth control (Don't forget, the only 100% success rate is abstinence, and, looking at our species, driven by lust, greed, and indifference, the chances of abstinence prevailing is slim), victims of 'playas'...
I'll admit that at some point you have to take responsibility for yourself, and I'll agree that by no means should abortion be used as a means of birth control. HOWEVER, there are legitimate reasons for abortion. Life may be life, but from a scientific, financial, and objective (by which I mean emotionally distant) standpoint, pro choice takes precedent over pro life, merely because there are more people having children than those willing to take care of them.
I'll agree that it shouldn't be government supported, merely for the fact that it's something better provided for by NPOs. Especially considering there are also tax dollars going to orphanages which are completely incapable of finding homes for *all* the children in their charge.
All in all, yes, it seems often people forget that there are other solutions, including aforementioned orphanages. No method should necessarily discount another, but I believe the constitution specifically stated a right to LIFE, LIBERTY, and THE PURSUIT of HAPPINESS. Maybe try thinking of adoption. The system may suck, but at that point, at least the offspring is free to make it's own choice as to whether s/he wishes to live or die.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home