Archive for July, 2011

Lady Gaga to Become ULC Minister?

Friday, July 29th, 2011

Last year on the ULC Monastery blog we posted a story about Lady Gaga’s plan to become ordained as a minister, but it was unclear which church she intended to join. Now there is a suggestion that the pop singer might get ordained in the Universal Life Church, for the purpose of marrying her same-sex fans. Similar same-sex ceremonies officiated by the singer would follow.

The openly bisexual singer of “Born This Way”, “Judas”, and other major hits revealed her plans in an interview on KISS FM. She told the radio station that she is pursuing ordination so that she can marry her yoga instructor to her instructor’s partner in a same-sex ceremony. Similar ceremonies officiated by the singer are expected to follow. A factor driving the pop megastar’s decision is the recent passage of the Marriage Equality Bill in New York state, which legalized same-sex marriage. The new law will make it easier for her to serve as a legal wedding officiant at same-sex ceremonies, and the most likely path seems to be ordination in a nondenominational online church since online churches tend to recognize same-sex unions and teach that everybody has the right to be an ordained minister.

Of course, as always, naysayers have criticized Lady Gaga’s decision as well as the whole online ordination phenomenon itself. For a person to get ordained in order to marry their friends makes a mockery of marriage, they argue, because marriage should be treated with solemnity and sacredness. Actually, though, the opposite is true.

Anybody can go to a county clerk’s office and get married as long as they have $50 and the right set of chromosomes, even if they do not love each other, and anybody can get married by a minister who has received traditional minister training and education, even if the minister is a complete stranger to be people being married and has no personal connection to their relationship.

By contrast, people get ordained online to marry other people specifically because they know those people love each other, and not just because they can procreate; they also get ordained online because they have a personal connection with the people they are marrying, lending greater meaning to the ceremony. So, no, compared with ministers marrying complete strangers just because they have the money for the certificate and they can procreate, Lady Gaga getting ordained to marry her yoga instructor is hardly a mockery of marriage.

The Universal Life Church Monastery is happy to see people in positions of immense cultural influence championing sacerdotal ordination rights as well as the right of two consenting adults to confirm their love for one another in a legal sacramental wedding ceremony. Such a sign of commitment to social justice on the part of high-profile media personalities like Lady Gaga is a crucial step forward in making same-sex marriage a normal and acceptable thing. Hopefully we will see similar gestures from celebrity ministers in future.

Sources:

FABlife

Daily Mirror

Gigwise

    Rebel Priest Calls Story of Jesus a “Fable”

    Thursday, July 28th, 2011

    Despite its strict adherence to age-old dogma, the Roman Catholic Church has been home to some rather iconoclastic men (and women) of the cloth. The rebel Catholic organization Womenpriests has been challenging the Church’s stance on women in leadership roles, and now a priest recently expelled from the Church has suggested that the story of Christ might be nothing more than legend. This latest challenge to church orthodoxy further illustrates the pressure being placed on the Church to adapt to a modern society that increasingly values science and reason over faith and tradition.

    Father Peter Kennedy expressed his belief that the story of Jesus is a fable after he was dismissed by the church for similar unorthodox beliefs and practices. In particular, he has supported women leaders and same-sex relationships: not only did he give women leading roles in reading the homily during his tenure in the Church, but he routinely blessed sacramental same-sex unions. Such practices posed a problem for the Church, which has traditionally reserved leadership roles for heterosexual males, viewing women as subservient to men and homosexuality as an abomination against God, given that it does not result in offspring. After his dismissal from the Church, Fr Kennedy finally revealed to the press his views about Jesus Christ.

    Like his attitude about women and gay people, Fr Kennedy’s theology about Jesus and divine incarnation shows signs of rationalistic thinking and healthy criticism of ecclesiastical tradition. He tells Miranda Forster of The Sydney Morning Herald that the story of God incarnating as a human being to sacrifice himself for human sins, only to rise from the dead, is probably inspired largely by myths about “dying, rising God-men” or avatars found in pagan religions which preceded the Judeo-Christian faith tradition and served as a sort of template for it. (Apollo, the Greek sun-god, and Mithra, the Zoroastrian deity of covenant and oath, are both supposed by some to be human incarnations of the divine.) In fact, Fr Kennedy suggests, Jesus probably did not exist: “There is no corroborating evidence for the existence of a person called Jesus”, he says. Jesus the son of God, he explains, might be an archetype or metaphor—probably for spiritual trial, sacrifice, and ultimate triumph.

    Fr Kennedy does not identify as an atheist, however. Rather, he views God as a distant entity that does not intervene in human affairs, largely because of the fact that evil exists:

    “It’s true I’ve given up on that sort of a God, that sort of a ‘being’ that sits up there in heaven somewhere and intervenes in human affairs”, he tells Boyle, adding that “[i]f you believe in a God that intervenes into human history [sic]why didn’t God intervene in the massacre in Norway? Whatever God is, God is not that sort of God, obviously”. In other words, for Fr Kennedy, the fact that evil is allowed to exist precludes the possibility of a god, Providence, or higher powerwhich protects human beings from evil out of benevolence. At the same time, however, this leaves open the possibility that there exists a deity which allows the possibility of evil occurring in order to fulfill some greater purpose, such as forcing human beings to take personal responsibility for one another.

    There seem to be a growing number of spiritual-minded people like Fr Kennedy who have become ordained as priests only to contradict centuries-old dogma about the nature of the universe, God, family, love, procreation, and salvation. More and more Roman Catholics are starting to do the same and think for themselves, especially in light of the child abuse scandals that have forced them to question the moral authority of their own church. The Vatican as it currently exists will probably last for some time to come, but unruly forces springing forth from within the priestly classes, as well as revelations about church cover-ups, will inevitably force it either to adapt, or to crumble apart. At the same time, however, it seems overblown to wholly dismiss the Catholic Church’s potential for good, and we might acknowledge the ways in which the Church teaches us to treat our fellow human being with dignity and respect—especially by giving to the poor and needy. The ultimate question is how far the Church will go in reforming its theology and extending its charity to women, gay people, and other members of the historical underclass.

    Share your thoughts. What do you think about Fr Kennedy’s unorthodox practices and his theology concerning the existence and divinity of Jesus? Is it too much too soon, or do you wish to see more priests “come out of the closet”, as it were, and challenge the long-cherished teachings of the Holy See and other Christian denominations?

    Source:

    The Sydney Morning Herald

      ULC Ministers Lend a Hand in New York Weddings

      Wednesday, July 27th, 2011

      As they exult in the recent passage of marriage equality in New York state, supporters of same-sex marriage still have many questions about how to perform a legal wedding ceremony for the upsurge in newly engaged couples. Filling the vacuum of much sought-after wedding officiants is a host of newly ordained priests and ministers in the Universal Life Church Monastery, which has long supported full equality for lesbian and gay couples. During this time of momentous social change, these young ministers will be able to play a vital role in celebrating unions based on love and mutual respect.

      Demand for same-sex wedding officiants has surged since the passage of the bill, especially since New York state is the third most populous state in the United States, and New York City the most populous city in the country, with over eight million people in the city proper alone. Additionally, New York is the second biggest city in the world, just after Mexico City, where same-sex marriage is legal. Christina Boyle of The Daily News quotes ULC Monastery spokesman Andy Fulton as saying, “Just over half of the New York wedding officiant packages we’ve shipped since June 24 have gone to New York City”. New York’s size and influential role in world affairs, culture, and the economy make the passage of the bill particularly historic and show that change is possible on a relatively large and complex scale. Who better to welcome this giant leap forward than an interfaith, nondenominational church like ULC Monastery?

      ULC ministers have various reasons for deciding to get ordained online to perform a legal wedding ceremony, but many share a common vision of helping out traditionally marginalized people because they have seen firsthand that these people love each other just as much as anybody else and therefore deserve the same treatment. One of these ministers is Nancy McAlley, a registered nurse who decided to become a minister online in the church so that she could be there for couples who might be rejected by other wedding celebrants: “When the law passed, I felt there were so many people out there wanting to get married that I would sign up and be an option for them”, she told Boyle, adding that “gay couples deserve the same rights as straight couples,” McAlley, 61, said. “I’m open to doing the ceremonies anywhere”. Many ULC ministers agree and, realizing it is only fair and reasonable to reward our best human virtues, have offered their services as a gesture of recognition and respect for loving, committed relationships.

      But what are the roadblocks to getting a marriage legally solemnized in New York state? There are multiple resources which can help facilitate the ordination and marriage officiation process for both prospective ministers and engaged couples. Ministers and couples should obtain information on New York state wedding laws, which differ from those of other states, as well as contact their local clerk’s office to ensure that marriages are registered properly. In addition, specific documents (included in the ULC Monastery’s New York same-sex marriage officiant package) are required by the state and city of New York for ministers to carry out a legal sacramental wedding ceremony in these places. Of course, there are myriad other questions and concerns new ministers and couples have about marriage in New York, but hopefully these cover the basics and will help make for the best wedding experience possible.

      The news about marriage equality in New York is truly galvanizing, but people still have questions and concerns about logistics. If you have performed a wedding in New York or have been married there since the passage of the law, we invite you to share your story. What sort of hurdles did you have to overcome, and what advice can you give others who hope to find a wedding officiant or plan a wedding there?

      Source:

      New York Daily News

        Chaz Bono and Ann Coulter Discuss God and Psychiatry

        Tuesday, July 19th, 2011

        On a recent episode of the HBO talk show Real Time with Bill Maher, the issue of religious faith and health-care happened to come up, providing an important question to contemplate. The debate centered on conservative commentator Ann Coulter’s statement that, with special exception, she did not need psychiatry because she had faith in God, and LGBT activist Chaz Bono’s retort that God and psychiatry are not incompatible—a person can believe in and benefit from both. What the debate reveals is the lingering assumption that God necessarily works in the most mysterious and invisible ways, when in fact it is very possible that God works in the plainest, and most mundane of ways. It may not be very romantic, but it is commonsensible.

        The debate began when host Bill Maher mentioned that FOX news commentator Dr. Keith Ablow described Bono’s transition from male to female as a “psychotic delusion”. It was not Bono’s purported “pathology” which was the focus of the exchange, however, but rather the usefulness of psychiatry and the role of God or a higher consciousness in mental health. After giving a brief summary of Ablow’s polemical attacks on himself and Bono, Maher asked Coulter if she would ever visit such a psychiatrist. In response, she stated no, because she believes in God . Bono chimed in and politely challenged Coulter by asking, “Believing in God and psychiatry—how are those two things opposed to each other?” Coulter did not give a direct response to this, but she did clarify that she would only visit a psychiatrist to seek treatment for chemical imbalances, relying on God in all other matters. Bono continued his challenge to Coulter’s either-or thinking by saying, “I’ve gotten great use of therapy, and I believe in God. I don’t look at them as two mutually exclusive things. I want all the help I can get.” In other words, Bono explains, God and mental health practices can go together.

        Bono’s concise and insightful argument can be illustrated using an allegory which is perhaps familiar to many readers. It is the parable of the God-fearing man who drowned, and it goes somewhat as follows. One day a terrible flood inundated a man’s town. When the waters threatened to submerge his house, a fire engine came and the firefighters aboard offered the man a ride to safety. He refused, stating that he relied on God to save him. Soon, the waters flooded his house and he was forced to climb atop the roof. A rescue boat came and the passengers offered the man a ride to higher ground. Still he refused, insisting that the power of God was on his side. Eventually, the floodwaters began creeping over the rooftop. A rescue helicopter came, and the passengers offered him safe refuge several miles away. Once again he refused assistance, claiming that God would save him. Eventually the waters overtook the entire house and swallowed the man, and consequently he drowned. When he reached the heaven of the biblical afterlife, he met God. He asked God, “Why did you not save me from the flood waters? I showed faith in you.” Nonplussed, God responded, “What are you talking about? I tried to save you. I sent you a fire engine, and when you refused this, I sent you a boat, and when you refused this, I sent you a helicopter. Still, you refused my help. What else could I have done to save you?” The point is that divine intervention may be less mysterious than we think.

        Why do people expect God to be so enigmatic and supernatural? What must God do to drive the message home? The notion that medicine is necessarily separate from the work of God may stem from an artificial separation of God and nature. This attitude seems to be more commonplace among Christians, Jews, Muslims, and others who follow the monotheistic Abrahamic faiths than it is among pagans, witches, and others who follow earth-centered religions. In the “separationist” view, psychiatry is connected with earth, and not God, because it is the product of human beings, who are earthly creatures separated from God. Of course, this presupposes that God and the earth are separate in the first place. But what if they are somehow connected, and what if nature is in God, and God, in nature (resulting in pantheism)? If this is the case, psychiatry and other forms of medicine, mental health, and the healing arts are not incompatible with God, because they are earthly constructs, and earthly constructs derive from God. In a word, psychiatry and other products of the human intellect might constitute the work of God through earthly instruments.

        This idea may be hard for traditional monotheists and some Christian Scientists to accept, but it is probably a no-brainer to many pagans. Separating the divine from the natural might sometimes be an inappropriate and even counter-productive action to take. This point becomes especially important when we consider cases in which parents neglect ailing children out of the belief that God will heal them. As Bono tried to point out to his friend Coulter on Maher’s show, there is no reason why faith in God and human medicine should not work in unison to provide optimal healing for mind and body. If we want to find the “fingerprint of God” or some other sign of the divine at work in our daily lives, we may have no further to look than our local scientific research laboratory, where the latest discoveries in science, medicine, and technology are being made. For these are all earthly constructs.

        Tell us what you think. Can humans be healed of mental or physical illness through the act of prayer or faith alone, or is human medicine a crucial tool in divine intervention?

        Source:

        Media-ite

          The Rise of Evangelical Child Indoctrination

          Monday, July 18th, 2011

          Many of our readers are familiar with the revelatory 2006 video Jesus Camp, which exposes the evangelical indoctrination of children at a charismatic Christian youth camp in the rural U.S. state of North Dakota. This use of children for evangelization is not an isolated incident, however, but a growing trend throughout the southern United States, with potential consequences for surrounding regions and in government affairs. Lurking beneath the ardent religious piety are strong signs of child exploitation and anti-secularism, tied together by the organizing principle that the United States must be Christianized in preparation for the return of Jesus Christ of Nazareth—with one powerful U.S. state governor at the helm.

          Rick Perry, the governor of the U.S. state of Texas, plays a central role in the proliferation of radical Christian youth ministries. In collaboration with the American Family Association and the International House of Prayer, Perry is organizing a 6 August prayer rally called “The Response” at the Houston Reliant Stadium, where he proclaimed that America’s economic troubles are a part of God’s plan to restore biblical values to the U.S. Just two weekends before Perry’s conference, a coalition of radical youth ministries will be hosting The Elijah Revolution, one of a series of conferences and initiatives focused on rousing radical religious devotion in teenagers.

          Among the prayer “leaders” of the rally are staff from the International House of Prayer (also known as “IHOP”), a so-called “spiritual warfare center” in Kansas City, Missouri where right-wing, fundamentalist evangelicals convene to pray twenty-four hours a day, three hundred and sixty-five days a year. IHOP subscribes to the “Seven Mountains” theology, which gives seven spheres in which America must be “taken back” for Jesus Christ—through family, education, government, the economy, the arts, the media, and religion. Lou Engles is one of the religious leaders featured on its Web site. A major goal of the organization is to convert as many children as possible and use them to evangelize non-believers. So far, IHOP has trained over 25,000 children at its “Signs and Wonders” camps and is hoping to reach one million in Kansas City and around the world at its future 120-acre compound called “Shiloh”.

          The Seven Mountains theology underpinning IHOP’s vision is shared by “TheCall”, an organization also headed by Engles which sets up days of prayer and fasting for children. One of TheCall’s missions under Engle is to set up Justice Houses of Prayer around the U.S. in order to pray for help to combat liberal social causes such as abortion and to populate government with “righteous” Christian leaders. According to an article on the Web site Goddiscussion, the first of these evangelical prayer chapels was set up in 2004 as part of a sort of chain or network.

          But the web in which Gov. Perry is entangled is much larger than these two groups. As the Goddiscussion article states, Engles is also highly influential in another radical youth ministry called The Elijah Revolution (associated with the conference mentioned above), yet another youth ministry centered on the Seven Mountains theology. The goal of the Elijah Revolution is like that of the other two ministries—to prepare for the rapture and the second coming of Christ, and for the creation of a Christian kingdom on earth, by conquering the seven spheres mentioned above for Christians. The organization illustrates the aim of its mission using the stories of the pure-hearted Elijah and the wicked temptress Jezebel, whom the spirit of Elijah must overcome. Citing Malachi 4:6, its members believe that children will bring adults back into the Christian flock. The group even has an album named after it, featuring Engle’s voice put to song and lamenting the state of America and the need for the spirit of Elijah to conquer Jezebel.

          Gov. Perry’s connection with radical youth prayer groups does not end here, though.

          Elijah is connected with yet another prayer warfare-type ministry. So-called prophet Cindy Jacobs cites the Elijah album in her intercessory prayer groups called

          “Root 52”, the purpose of which is to target “godless” parts of America in order to transform them into Christian havens. Seattle,Washington state, and the Pacific Northwest in general are among the strongly secular regions targeted by the group, and they outline their goal in a highly vivid and charismatic “Washington prayer alert”:

          In mapping both Seattle and Olympia many key ley lines have been discovered (a majority of them have been established through the arts). Olympia is laid out much like Washington D.C. influenced by free-masonry design and structure. We believe that a key to binding and bringing down these Baal/witchcraft/jezebel influenced strongholds will be through the Arts and Media sphere! May God raise up anointed singers, musicians, artists, craftsmen, sculptors, dancers, etc, in the Northwest! We are praying for the hearts of the fathers to turn to the children and the hearts of the children to turn to the Fathers to release an Elijah Revolution that confront this jezebel spirit. And we are praying for a generation of Jehu’s who walk in sexual purity and the truth and power of God’s written Word to bring her down (Rev. 2:18-29). As the light of the Glory of God in face of Christ increases through day and night prayer and worship combined with a kingly anointing, we will see these demonic strongholds dislodged from this region!

          We stake a Claim in the midst of the Whirlwind for the Glory of the Lamb through every sphere in society in Washington State. May God “Wash” Washington, “a ton” through the blood of his Son. Jesus we plead your blood over our sins and the sins of our state. God end abortion and send Revival to Washington! Amen! [sic]

          The hope is that the city of Seattle (where the Universal Life Church Monastery happens to be headquartered), along with Washington and the Northwest, will capitulate to pressure from evangelical prayer groups, who hope to transform it into one of the aforementioned Christian havens through the power of intercessory prayer. In order to do this, alternate traditions and concepts such as Free Masonry and ley lines must be eradicated, and the arts community of this northwestern coastal port city infiltrated and co-opted by the prayer warriors from their stronghold in the ardently religious south.

          On top of this, Engles is connected with Becky Fischer, the religious leader featured in the Jesus Camp film, which documents events at the “Kids on Fire School of Ministry” Pentecostal summer camp. According to the Goddiscussion article, Fischer belongs to a network of charismatic churches and ministries which hold a belief in modern-day prophets and apostles—namely, children (cf. Malachi 4:6 above). Engles is one of the adult apostolic “prophets” whose teachings are featured on Fischer’s Web site.

          So far, what we see is that Gov. Perry’s August conference is led by a group (IHOP) which is strongly influenced by an evangelical leader and prayer warrior (Engles) who is connected with multiple other groups (TheCall, Elijah Revolution, Root 52, and Kids on Fire) who use children as pawns to evangelize America in preparation for a brutal Harold Camping-style Apocalypse. While we cannot accuse these other groups of guilt by association, we can be fairly confident in saying that Perry is colluding in the child prayer warrior scheme in his attempt to transform America through supernatural means into a land based solely on evangelical, charismatic Christian principles—especially those “godless” bastions of secularism like Seattle. Naturally, this vision is not shared by the interfaith Universal Life Church Monastery, which believes that we are all children of the same universe and that all religions have something good to contribute to humanity. It is also disturbing to see impressionable young children used so shamelessly as leveraging tools to promote adult religious agendas. Thus, we look on with a wary eye at Perry and the well-organized prayer warfare network rising in the U.S. south.

          Give us your thoughts. Do you welcome ministries characterized by child “prayer-warriors”, or do you view them with suspicion?

          Source:

          Goddiscussion

            Hebrew Bible Written By Humans, Computer Scientists Say

            Wednesday, July 13th, 2011

            The accelerating pace of technological advancement is almost mind-blowing, but modern-day computers are not only able to beat human beings at chess—they are now able to determine who probably wrote the Tanakh, or the Hebrew Bible. According to the results, multiple styles and voices were used in composing many of these ancient, sacred Hebrew texts. Naturally, this finding undermines the evangelical belief in the inerrant, divine inspiration of the holy book of the Judeo-Christian tradition. What ultimately matters, though, may not be whether the book was divinely inspired, but whether, despite its authorship, it offers insight into living a good and moral life.

            The study was carried out by a team of computer scientists at Bar Ilan University in Ramat Gan, Israel, using a software program that analyzes differences in writing style, and the results were summarized in an article in The Anglican Journal. Traditionally, scholars have distinguished two different major styles in the Hebrew Bible (which includes the Torah, also known as the Pentateuch, or Five Books of Moses)—a “priestly” style, and a lay style, the former being associated with the priests of the temple in Jerusalem, and the latter, with the laity. The researchers found that the computer-generated analysis duplicated the findings of scholars with ninety per cent accuracy, showing regular difference in style and diction (such as the words for God, staff, if, and but). In a paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics in Portland, Oregon, they said that they had “been able to largely recapitulate several centuries of painstaking manual labor with our automated method”. The implication of this clergy-laity distinction is that the Bible is not necessarily inspired by an almighty deity, but by human beings with their own idiosyncrasies and foibles.

            But maybe it does not matter whether the Bible is divinely inspired. As The Anglican Journal reports, the research team were hesitant to conclude categorically that these founding documents and holy texts of the Jewish faith tradition, which also inform Christian theology and doctrine, were definitely conceived by human minds alone. The reason books of the Old Testament like Genesis show differences in style, word choice, and idiom could be that God chose to author the text in different ways, they admit, pointing out that scientific research will never satisfactorily answer whether the Bible is the work of God. Do we need to answer this question, though? Perhaps we should be satisfied in the understanding that certain parts of the Bible (not the part about how to sell your daughter into slavery, of course) serve as a guide for living a healthy, happy, productive, fulfilling life, and to do good things for other people. If morals are good for their own sake, we can live by them for their own sake, whether or not they were prescribed by God.

            The most astonishing thing revealed in the Anglican Journal article is not simply that scholars have been observing the Bible’s stylistic discrepancies for centuries, but that these observations have been corroborated by researchers through modern-day computer-generated analysis. It is probably more difficult to inject one’s bias into a research project when one is employing the cold, uncompromisingly objective genius of a software program. Consequently, the fact that both biblical scholars, in the course of centuries, and a software program, in just minutes, can come to the same conclusion about the probable human provenance of the Bible, is telling. But we need not be discouraged by the prospect that it was just old Jewish patriarchs with their own very earthly human agendas who composed the beloved and venerated works of the Hebrew Bible, because we can distil a sense of moral purpose from these anyway.

            We are curious to know what our priests, ministers, and rabbis ordained online think about this issue. Does the suggestion that the Bible may have been written by multiple humans, and not God, affect the way you view the Bible? Does it compromise the sense of purpose you may have previously derived from the book, or does it make little difference to you either way? Does the “word” of God remain as such to you in either priestly or non-priestly phraseology, or does it mirror the errancy and imperfection of human nature?

            Source:

            The Anglican Journal

              ULC Minister Authors Book on Life and Consciousness

              Tuesday, July 12th, 2011

              ULC ministers are known for undertaking many unique projects, especially unusual or off-the-wall wedding ceremonies. From celebrity ministers like Kathy Griffin to alternative retail weddings held in Home Depots and shopping malls, we are all familiar with the quirky ways in which members of the ULC carry out their ministries. But the church is not populated solely by wedding officiants—it has its fair share of philosophers and theologians, too. Earlier this year, one minister in the church released a book on the nature of life and consciousness called Science of Spirit: Lost Keys to the Kingdom…on Earth. While the book may echo the ideas and sentiments of many New Thought writers, it does pay heed to some recent scientific findings, offering an interesting read to anybody interested in exploring the relationship between physics and consciousness.

              In the book, author and ULC minister Robert Donald Tonelli discusses the interconnectedness of life in the cosmos and makes the claim that the universe itself is a process characterized by the evolution of consciousness. The book is the result of Tonelli’s musings on the nature and meaning of life and the universe, and leads to the startling conclusion that consciousness—not matter or energy—are the foundation of the cosmos. In fact, Tonelli suggests, energy and consciousness are actually inextricably linked. Additionally, he explains in the book, the cosmos is never static, but always dynamic—it is not a state of being, but actually a continual process or sequence of events and occurrences that have been taking place since the Big Bang. The purpose of this process, the author claims, is for consciousness to evolve and realize its full potential. From this perspective, matter and energy would seem to be the output of this process.

              Many who hold a materialist worldview will have already dismissed Tonelli’s theory as “junk science” or “pseudoscience”, but his ideas may not totally be without merit, and recent findings in quantum physics may support his claims. Referring to wave-particle complementarity (the phenomenon that describes how light waves take the form of particles—photons—when measured or observed by the experimenter), Nobel Prize-winning physicist Niels Bohr says, “[i]n the great drama of existence we ourselves are both actors and spectators” (van Lommel 235). Mathematician John von Neumann suggests that the act of observation itself creates physical reality when he says, “[t]he world is built not out of bits of matter, but out of bits of knowledge—subjective, conscious knowings” (237). And, referring to the relationship between the mind and the brain, philosopher and neuroscientist Alva Noë flatly contradicts the assumptions of materialist thinkers like Daniel Dennett, Richard Dawkins, and Susan Blackmore:

              Consciousness does not happen in the brain…. What determines and controls the character of conscious experience is not the associated neural activity. It is misguided to search for neural correlates of consciousness: there are no such neural structures. That is why we have been unable to come up with a good explanation of its neural basis…. The idea that we are our brains is not something scientists have learned; it is rather a preconception (185).

              Basically, what scientists like Bohr, von Neumann, and Noë suggest is that consciousness is not an epiphenomenon of matter or energy (not even the brain), but rather that matter and energy are consequent to, or at the very least linked with, consciousness, which is fundamental in the universe. This uncannily corroborates Tonelli’s notion that the experience of an increasingly sophisticated, self-aware consciousness is the fundamental purpose of the

              universe.

              Tonelli’s view of life and the cosmos raises some profound questions. Is the brain the source of consciousness, or merely a kind of transceiver, and is death the end, or is there something after? Can artificial intelligence attain self-awareness? If the Big Bang marked the beginning of some sort of experiment in the evolution of consciousness, what preceded it—a mysterious state of pure consciousness? What happens when the universe has evolved to such a degree that it returns once again to a state of pure consciousness? Will a new universe have to be created somewhere to undergo the process once again as part of an endless cycle? And what is the relationship between human beings and nature; how do other life-forms fit into the scheme of things? These are ambitious questions, and we may never get satisfactory answers to all of them, but we have to start somewhere. Besides, they do make us think.

              Science of Spirit attempts to incorporate scientific sensibilities in explaining the spiritual purpose of the universe. While some will disregard it as pseudoscience, others will appreciate how the ideas presented in the book seem to be echoed, at least loosely, by progressive theories in quantum physics. At the very least, it is good to know that some people who decide to become ordained in the ULC do so with the desire to encourage self-reflection and cultivate an appreciation for the contributions of science. Maybe one day this daunting search will yield more answers than we could ever have hoped to find.

              Sources:

              PRWeb

              van Lommel, Pim. Consciousness Beyond Life: The Sciene of the Near-Death Experience.

              New York: HarperCollins, 2010. Print.

                Can The Internet Be Considered A Religion?

                Tuesday, July 5th, 2011

                Religions seem to spring forth left and right from the vacuum of space itself—there are religions founded on conspiracy theories, alien abduction, “redneck” culture, and even the art of body modification. But can the Internet be considered a religion? It may make more sense than one thinks. One cancer survivor and entrepreneur recently declared the Internet to be his religion. The reason he gives is that the Internet brings people together to fight for social and political justice.

                The statement was made by Internet activist Jim Gilliam at the Personal Democracy Forum, a conference organized to discuss the impact of technology on politics and government. Gilliam related to the audience the story of his fight with cancer, and how the radiation treatment for the disease damaged his lungs. The lung damage meant that he had to receive a double-lung transplant to live, but the UCLA Medical Center refused to perform the surgery, citing the difficulty of undertaking such a complicated procedure. Upset at the university’s decision, Gilliam wrote a blog entry about it, inspiring a volunteer in one of his companies to write a letter to UCLA accusing it of performing only easy surgeries in order to create the impression that the school’s hospital had a high success rate. Others, including Gilliam’s sister, joined the effort, writing emails to UCLA in support of Gilliam. Eventually the school capitulated and offered to perform the surgery on Gilliam.

                Gilliam attributes the school’s change of heart to the power of technology to change people’s minds. The Internet, he explains, has made it easier for people to make their concerns known: “Today I breathe through someone else’s lungs, while another’s blood flows through my veins”, he told the audience, adding, “I have faith in people. I believe in God, and the Internet is my religion.” In other words, Gilliam’s religion is the coming together of people through advanced communications technology for the purpose of improving the human condition. God, Gilliam states, results from humanity’s interconnectedness. We might say that, in many ways, this religion resembles humanism or nonreligious spirituality.

                It may be a stretch to compare this “Internet religion” to organized religions such as the Southern Baptist Church, the Roman Catholic Church, the beliefs and teachings of Buddhism, or even Scientology, but we might be able to call the World Wide Web a spiritually galvanizing force. The Internet has already become a popular medium for disseminating religious doctrine and theology and for facilitating online prayers and online sermons, and it has also led to the advent of the nondenominational online church; there is now even a Bible app for smartphones, and a recent study suggested Apple, Inc. might be considered a religion because of the enthusiasm it breeds in its fans. In addition, the democratic nature of information technology and Internet communication, which enables people to express themselves in new and unprecedented ways, seems to allow for spiritual liberation and the democratization of organized religion. It will be interesting to watch the relationship between religion and technology grow and metamorphose in the coming years.

                We value your thoughts, given your role as a pastor, priest, or minister ordained online. As a reverend, do you think the Internet can be considered a religion? Does it play an important role for you in religious practice and in spiritual exploration?

                Source:

                ABC News

                  The Universal Life Church Monastery supports the gay community

                  Friday, July 1st, 2011

                  “We are all children of the same universe.”

                  Equal marriage rights in the eyes of state and federal law are not granted to a significant portion of America’s population. This denial of rights is no less than discrimination against a minority group. Gay discrimination is unabashedly promoted by social organizations, public figures, and even religious groups. The venerable Catholic Church has repeatedly demonstrated that it can be this kind of religious organization. It has repeatedly been one of marriage equality’s staunchest opponents by actively campaigning against it and labeling it “immoral” and an “ominous threat” to American society.

                  The Universal Life Church Monastery is a religious organization that does not tolerate this kind of discrimination. It stands firm behind its closely-held belief that anyone and everyone should have the right to do anything they choose as long as it does not infringe on the rights of others. This stance manifests itself in the ULC Monastery’s life-long push toward complete marriage equality: loving same-sex couples must have the same matrimonial privileges as their opposite sex counterparts. The right to “civil unions” is not enough.

                  The Universal Life Church Monastery refuses to take a passive approach with the institutionalized discrimination of gay Americans, nor is it content to make hollow claims about its support of marriage equality. The following are two ways in which the ULC Monastery is “putting its money where its mouth is” by helping America’s gay community.

                  On June 17, 2009 a letter drafted by the ULC Monastery’s Presiding Chaplain G. Martin Freeman was sent to President Barack Obama. The letter shared Freeman’s frank opinion with President Obama that the topic of gay marriage is one of the most important issues of his presidency and encouraged him to continue supporting gays regardless of the stiff opposition facing him. President Obama responded to the ULC Monastery with a letter which affirmed that “every American deserves equal protection under [America’s] laws, and neither Federal nor state law should discriminate against any American”. He assured Freeman that his administration is “committed to addressing a full spectrum of issues relating to the LGBT community” and thanked him for his interest in gay rights.

                  As a non-profit organization, the Universal Life Church Monastery has donated considerable sums of money to charitable causes like the Lambert House since it was founded in 2006. The most recent donation made by the ULC Monastery in support of gays came in the form of a sizable contribution to the effort to raise the Pride flag from Seattle’s Space Needle. Money from this donation will be distributed to the GSBA Scholarship Fund, Mary’s Place, It Gets Better, and Lambda Legal. It is the ULC Monastery’s hope that with its donation these organizations will increase the quality of life for marginalized gay youth and, in turn, bring up the gay community as a whole.

                  Gay men and women of America: the Universal Life Church Monastery will fight – hard – to gain complete marriage equality for you. It has advocated on your behalf to the highest levels of the US government and has donated large sums of money for gay causes. The decision by the New York State Senate to legalize gay marriage gives the ULC Monastery a clear and defined objective: legalized gay marriage in all 50 states. The ULC Monastery vows to continue its efforts on your behalf until this admittedly lofty goal has been achieved.